SRA Logo -- Back to Home Page  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HomeAbout UsIndustriesMethodologiesNewsCareersContact
 
Table of Contents
Issue 9
April 2005
 

Managing for performance has long-been used as a correlation of salary or bonus pay. Performance is weighted against customer satisfaction and loyalty as a way of motivating employees and increasing the company's responsiveness to its customers. To do this fairly, however, companies must be able to accurately measure one factor against the other.

SRA compiled results from several sources, including clients and contacts that are actively involved in performance management, and has come up with the following guidelines:

•  Employee Input is Essential

The number one observation of our clients and contacts is that before any customer satisfaction program is undertaken, research must be conducted among employees. In order to have employees buy into the system, it is imperative that their voices be heard. Ideally, this is accomplished through a series of focus groups.

•  Indicators of Satisfaction Identified

Based on the information provided by employees at focus groups, a series of key factors for delivering quality service and driving customer satisfaction are developed and tested. Ongoing surveys are then conducted among customers to measure a company's performance on these key indicators.

•  Reward Systems Based on a Mix of Several Factors

Among the factors typically included in a reward/bonus program are the following:

– Financial: Revenues, Return on Investment, Operating Costs

– 360-degree Review: Evaluations based on peers, customers, subordinates, and supervisors

– Customer Satisfaction Score: Metrics derived from a statistically valid sample of customer interviews

– Quality Performance Ratings: Metrics derived from internal measurements of performance in areas important to quality of service

•  Balance Between Financial and Customer Satisfaction Factors

Although the percentage of rewards based on customer satisfaction varies widely by company, about one-quarter to one-third of rewards is a commonly accepted level, with the rest apportioned between financial measures and peer review. In companies that take internal measurements of performance (i.e., number of customer service calls, time on hold, time to resolution) to complement customer satisfaction ratings, internal measures are balanced with customer ratings.

Among companies without standardized internal performance measures, customer satisfaction ratings are commonly used as a “gate.” The gate establishes the level at which an employee becomes eligible for some level of bonus, while other factors are used to determine the actual amount of the bonus. The gate is recommended by many because the entry level decision remains in the hands of management.

•  Fair Requirements

Incentives are scaled to provide a disincentive for below-acceptable performance and a reward for outstanding performance. In other words, both a high bar and a low bar are established.

To be effective motivators, minimum requirements need to be seen as fair and obtainable. While rewards for attaining high bar levels should be substantial enough to create an incentive, they should be somewhat difficult to achieve. Finally, reward scales or gate levels should be reviewed at regular intervals. ‡

 

   

© 2001, 2002 - SRA Research Group, Inc. - All rights reserved.
Website created by Chameleon Design